Resources that are “open”, such as unlicensed spectrum, a deployment of base stations open to all service providers, or resources that are shared among a coalition of service providers by agreement, may offer greater sharing gains in mmWave bands than at conventional cellular frequencies. However, even when sharing is technically beneficial, it may not be profitable. In this project, we study both the technical and economic implications of resource sharing in millimeter wave cellular networks. Our findings include the following:
- Without open resources, market entry can be challenging in mmWave networks. “Open” deployments of neutral small cells that serve subscribers of any service provider encourage market entry by making it easier for networks to reach critical mass. Unlicensed spectrum does not have a similarly encouraging effect on market entry.
- – In a vertically differentiated duopoly market, resource sharing increases revenue less often for millimeter wave service providers than it would for microwave cellular service providers, and does not necessarily increase consumer surplus. Resource sharing is profitable for both service providers in a duopoly mmWave market only when the market is highly segmented and there is little price competition.
This work was supported in part by affiliate members of NYU WIRELESS as well as NSF grants 1302336, 1564142, 1547332, 1619129, 1320472, 1555332.
|M. Polese; M. Giordani; M. Mezzavilla; S. Rangan; M. Zorzi, "Improved Handover Through Dual Connectivity in 5G mmWave Mobile Networks," in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol.PP, no.99, pp.1-1||Spectrum Sharing||2017/07/07|
|G. R. MacCartney, Jr. and T. S. Rappaport, “Rural Macrocell Path Loss Models for Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications,” in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1663-1677, July 2017.||100 GHz, Dynamic Channel Models, Macro-diversity, MmWave cellular system design, mmWave Channel Modeling, mmWave Channel Models, mmWave MAC, multi connectivity handover, Spatial Channel Estimation and Tracking, Spectrum Sharing||2017/07/03|
|M. Rebato, F. Boccardi, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan and M. Zorzi, "Hybrid Spectrum Sharing in mmWave Cellular Networks," in IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 155-168, June 2017.||Spectrum Sharing||2017/06/01|
|F. Fund, S. Shahsavari, S. S. Panwar, E. Erkip, S. Rangan, "Resource Sharing Among mmWave Cellular Service Providers in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly," ICC 2017.||Spectrum Sharing||2017/02/22|
|F. Fund, S. Shahsavari, S. Panwar, E. Erkip, S. Rangan, "Do open resources encourage entry into the millimeter wave cellular service market?" In Proceedings of the Eighth Wireless of the Students, by the Students, and for the Students Workshop (S3). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12-14. October 03 - 07, 2016||5G Channel Models, Cellular networks, mmwave, Spectrum Sharing||2016/10/03|
|M. Rebato, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, M. Zorzi, “The Potential of Resource Sharing in 5G Millimeter-Wave Bands”, under review for IEEE Communications Magazine.||Spectrum Sharing||2016/08/25|
|M. Rebato, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, M. Zorzi, "Resource Sharing in 5G mmWave Cellular Networks", accepted at IEEE INFOCOM mmWave Networking Workshop, April 2016, San Francisco.||Spectrum Sharing||2016/08/22|
|M. Rebato, F. Boccardi, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan and M. Zorzi, "Hybrid spectrum access for mmWave networks," 2016 Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (Med-Hoc-Net), Vilanova i la Geltru, Spain, 2016, pp. 1-7.||Cellular networks, mmwave, Network Design, Spectrum Sharing||2016/06/22|
|M. Rebato, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, F. Boccardi and M. Zorzi, "Understanding Noise and Interference Regimes in 5G Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks," European Wireless 2016; 22th European Wireless Conference, Oulu, Finland, 2016, pp. 1-5.||Spectrum Sharing||2016/05/20|